Critical conversations in science
第7回 The Reproducibility Crisis in Scientific Research

Revealing a startling statistic, a 2016 Nature survey reported that over 70% of researchers struggled to reproduce other scientists’ experiments, with more than half unable to reproduce their own experiments(1)! These findings highlight serious, deep-rooted issue in scientific research, known as ‘reproducibility crisis.’
What is the reproducibility crisis?
The Reproducibility crisis refers to an ongoing issue where the results of numerous scientific studies across multiple fields are difficult, or even impossible, to reproduce.
To understand this better, let’s explore the meaning of ‘reproducibility’ and ‘replicability,’ which are often used interchangeably, but have slightly differing meanings(2):
- A study is considered reproducible when the data can be reanalyzed using the same methods to yield the same results.
- A study is replicable when the same research methods applied to new datasets and still produce the same results.
While both concepts are foundational to the scientific method, replication is challenging due to the significant financial and time costs required to obtain new data. As a result, while replicability remains the gold standard in scientific research, reproducibility is becoming increasingly important in assessing the validity and rigor of a study.
表紙:経年変化してグラデーションに紙焼けをした古紙を材料にコラージュ作品を生み出す作家「余地|yoti」。
古い科学雑誌を素材にして、特集名に着想を受け、つくりおろしています。
デザイン SKG(株)
表紙絵 佐藤 洋美(余地|yoti)